|
A Puzzle For Dave: Answer
This is from Sunday's Parade magazine, a newspaper
insert. (I wrote it from memory).
A mathematics professor always wanted his daughter to do
well in school. Through the years he spent lots of time
coaching his daughter through difficult math problems and
she became quite good at it. Soon, she left for college to
study mathematics (of course). One day, during a break, she
brought home a problem that even he could not figure out:
What three letters come next in this equation?
The answer...

The puzzle is not mathematical at all. The letters above
the line are made using straight lines only and the letters
below the line have curves in them.
So, it's really a matter of how you perceive the problem.
David Dunham
writes:
"You got the letters right but have the wrong
explanation. The letters on top all start with a vowel
sound; the letters on the bottom all start with a
consonant."
I guess there can be more than one answer.
Michel Benevento
writes:
"The most fascinating thing about mathematics
is that it's the same all over the world (and probably
elsewhere too). This has inspired many philosophical debates
(is 1+1=2 an absolute truth or an agreement?).
The first thing I noticed when I looked at the puzzle was
that it wasn't math (math looks differently). But Cameron's
explanation is still universal (making it more suitable for
the Internet) while David's is only true in some languages.
On the other hand, Cameron's explanation depends on the font
used (making it less suitable for the Internet).
For me, this makes the entire problem kind of
uninteresting. It misses the thrill of 'why didn't I see
that?' when you read the answer."
I respond:
You're looking at the puzzle from the
viewpoint of a mathematician. I am looking at he puzzle from
the viewpoint of a typographer, someone who studies the
shapes, forms and aspects of type. While a mathematician
looks at the puzzle analytically, a typographer looks at the
puzzle visually.
Is the puzzle a trick? Does the fact that the puzzle
story contains references to a mathematician cause the
reader to see the puzzle as a math puzzle? Is it just a
matter of perception?
A note: I purposely re-created the puzzle in a graphical
(GIF) form because I knew that lots of people have their
web browsers set to view with different fonts selected,
effectively causing the puzzle to display differently.
|